Elon Musk sparks outrage by telling X users to follow accounts that spread false narratives about Israel

It’s no secret that when there’s a major global event, social media platforms become a hub of information, both accurate and misleading. But what happens when the owner of a major social media platform takes a personal interest in promoting questionable sources? That’s precisely what’s unfolding on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, amidst the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Musk’s controversial recommendations

Following Hamas’ recent attack on Israeli civilians, false information started flooding X as the tension between Hamas militants and Israel reached a fever pitch.

Enter Elon Musk, the platform’s owner, who took it upon himself to recommend users follow @WarMonitors & @sentdefender, accounts that have previously spread misinformation. Musk’s tweet, which reached a staggering 11 million views in just three hours, was eventually deleted. But the ripple effect had already begun.

credit: X

MORE: CHINA HACKING GROUP CAUGHT SPYING ON U.S. ORGANIZATIONS

 

How Elon Musk’s tweet boosted two dubious accounts on X

Both @WarMonitors and @sentdefender have their fair share of controversies. Remember the false claim about an explosion near the White House that caused a brief dip in the Dow Jones? Yep, they were behind it.

Emerson T. Brooking, a notable digital researcher, even called out @sentdefender for regularly posting unverified and misleading content. Yet, Musk’s recommendation bolstered their visibility, potentially putting more users at risk of consuming false information.

 

X under Musk

Ever since Musk took the reins of X after he bought the platform for $44 billion last October, researchers have raised concerns about its credibility. Musk’s decisions, from removing “verified” checks to rewarding accounts based on engagement rather than accuracy, have made the platform a hotbed for misinformation. A recent study even found that Russian propaganda on X has increased since Musk’s takeover.

MORE: ELON MUSK’S CREEPY BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE GETS GREEN LIGHT FOR HUMAN TRIALS  

 

While Musk’s decisions for X have raised eyebrows, his disdain for mainstream media is palpable. He’s been vocal about users placing their trust in X over traditional news outlets. This stance, combined with decisions like removing article headlines in favor of images, has experts worried about reduced traffic to genuine news sites.

The larger implications

The digital realm’s misinformation isn’t just about wrong news; it’s about the consequences that follow. Fake reports of Israel’s prime minister being hospitalized and manipulated videos of attacks are just the tip of the iceberg.

The evolution and struggle of X under Elon Musk’s leadership

Under Elon Musk’s stewardship, X has undergone several changes, and this evolution hasn’t been without its challenges. Notably, there’s been a recent clash with the Anti-Defamation League.

After the league reported an uptick in antisemitic posts on X since Musk’s takeover, the tech mogul responded assertively, even hinting at potential legal action. This confrontation underscores the delicate balance platforms like X must maintain: ensuring freedom of speech while curbing the spread of harmful misinformation.

While Musk’s approach to these issues is distinctive, it’s a continuation of the broader debate on how social media platforms handle information in the modern era.

 

Kurt’s key takeaways

The Israel-Hamas scenario puts a spotlight on how powerful platforms like X can sway the narratives we consume. With Musk steering X, we all have to step up our game in discerning fact from fiction. It’s clear: in our digital age, the quest for truth is as intense as any on-the-ground conflict.

What are your strategies for navigating information on social platforms? Let us know by commenting below. 

 

Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:

 

 

Related posts

Best last minute holiday gifts

Understanding brushing scams and how to protect yourself

From TikTok to trouble: How your online data can be weaponized against you